DeAgenticAI encodes MiCA and DORA compliance as cryptographic policy for AI agents managing tokenized RWA portfolios. Inheritance Protocol for key person risk.
DeAgenticAI's Agentic Control Plane enforces cryptographic policy over AI agent authority — separating what an agent can do from what it is authorized to do — in Web3 and enterprise financial environments.
Your tokenised RWA portfolio settles on-chain. Your compliance obligations are MiCA-governed and human-verified. The infrastructure gap between those two realities is where operational risk lives.
The tokenised RWA market exceeded $33 billion in 2025. Sixty-five percent of holders are institutional. BlackRock BUIDL and Franklin Templeton tokenised money market funds are live. The capital is institutional. The compliance expectations are institutional. But the on-chain infrastructure was not built for institutional compliance.
DeAgenticAI’s Agentic Control Plane enforces cryptographic policy over AI agent authority — separating what an agent can do from what it is authorized to do — in Web3 and enterprise financial environments.
DeAgenticAI’s Policy DSL encodes MiCA and DORA compliance requirements as cryptographic policy, enabling AI agents to operate tokenized RWA portfolios within regulatory boundaries.
For RWA fund managers under MiCA, DORA, and Travel Rule requirements, the question is not whether to deploy AI agents — it is whether the infrastructure enforcing compliance is regulatory-grade.
Your fund operates under MiCA classification. Your KYC/AML obligations are jurisdictionally specific. Your DORA requirements mandate operational resilience documentation. None of this exists natively in current Web3 infrastructure. Compliance is a manual process layered on automated execution. Key person risk — the individual holding custody access — has no crypto-native continuity plan.
Fireblocks provides institutional custody. But custody is not compliance. MiCA requires operational processes meet regulatory standards. DORA requires documented operational resilience. Current tools enforce access control at the software layer. They do not encode regulatory requirements at the signing layer. Key person risk compounds the problem — if the HSM holder is unavailable, operations halt.
Regulatory policy encoded cryptographically. MiCA, DORA, Travel Rule — encoded in Policy DSL at the MPC signing layer.
Hardware-Hybrid Custody. One MPC key share on HSM. Satisfies DORA ICT risk requirements.
Inheritance Protocol. Time-locked key share release for key person risk. Crypto-native institutional continuity.
x402 Payments. AI agents pay for APIs/data within the full policy stack.
Step 1: Register portfolio agent identity via KYA with MiCA-classified credentials.
Step 2: Encode regulatory policy in Policy DSL — MiCA requirements, DORA resilience rules, Travel Rule obligations, jurisdiction-specific KYC/AML.
Step 3: Configure Hardware-Hybrid Custody with institutional HSM integration.
Step 4: Set Inheritance Protocol parameters — check-in periods, designated successors, policy-governed transfer conditions.
Step 5: Deploy with regulatory audit trail — every transaction produces MiCA-formatted compliance documentation.
Engaging with RWA fund managers under MiCA and DORA. Inheritance Protocol addresses key person risk no current Web3 tool solves. See AI agent compliance and regulatory for regulatory framework depth.
Fireblocks provides institutional custody. DeAgenticAI encodes regulatory compliance cryptographically at the signing layer — a fundamentally different capability.
| Feature | Fireblocks | DeAgenticAI |
|---|---|---|
| Design target | Human-initiated custody | Policy-governed AI agents |
| Regulatory encoding | Software-layer access control | Cryptographic signing-layer (MiCA, DORA) |
| Key person risk | HSM holder dependency | Inheritance Protocol (time-locked release) |
| Travel Rule | Third-party integration | Native Policy DSL encoding |
| Agent payments | Not supported | x402 policy-governed payments |
A practical sequence from authority design to controlled production rollout.
Establish a verifiable agent identity through KYA (Know Your Agent) with MiCA asset classification metadata. Your agent's DID carries regulatory context — token type, jurisdiction, and compliance class — so every downstream operation is evaluated against the correct regulatory framework.
Translate your regulatory obligations into the Policy DSL: MiCA asset class restrictions, DORA operational resilience requirements, Travel Rule data collection thresholds, and jurisdiction-specific reporting triggers. Policy is enforced cryptographically, not by application-layer checks.
Deploy Hardware-Hybrid Custody with HSM-backed key shards for institutional-grade key protection. MPC threshold signing ensures no single point of failure. Hardware security modules protect key material from cloud infrastructure compromise — a requirement for regulated fund operations.
Configure the Inheritance Protocol for key-person risk mitigation. Define dead-man switch intervals, succession hierarchies, and emergency recovery procedures. If a key custodian becomes unavailable, fund operations continue without exposing private key material.
Every operation produces a cryptographic enforcement proof tied to the specific regulation it satisfies: MiCA transaction classification, DORA resilience documentation, Travel Rule data capture, and MPC signing proof. Regulators receive verifiable compliance records — not self-attested reports.
MiCA asset classifications are encoded directly in the Policy DSL and enforced at the MPC signing layer. When an AI agent submits a transaction involving a tokenized real-world asset, the system evaluates it against the correct MiCA category (e-money token, asset-referenced token, or utility token) and applies the corresponding regulatory constraints. Non-compliant operations are rejected cryptographically before signing.
The Inheritance Protocol implements a dead-man switch with configurable intervals and succession hierarchies. If a key custodian fails to check in within the defined window, the protocol initiates a controlled key shard redistribution to designated successors — without ever reconstructing the full private key. Fund operations continue uninterrupted, and no single person's unavailability can lock assets.
Travel Rule data collection thresholds and originator/beneficiary information requirements are encoded in the Policy DSL. When a transfer exceeds the jurisdiction-specific threshold, the system automatically enforces data capture before the MPC signing nodes will produce a signature. The cryptographic enforcement proof includes Travel Rule compliance documentation for each qualifying transaction.
Every operation generates a cryptographic record that maps to DORA's ICT risk management requirements: system availability metrics, incident response timestamps, recovery procedure execution, and third-party dependency documentation. These are enforcement proofs — cryptographically verifiable records, not manually compiled reports — that satisfy DORA's audit and reporting obligations.
Our early access is invite-only. Join the design partner waitlist to track DeAgenticAI's progress and shape governed autonomous execution with our team. No marketing fluff-just infrastructure updates.
By joining, you agree to receive updates about our platform. No spam, ever.